Therefore, if we relativize this simple logic and assess whether our own representatives really represent us, the answer should be “no”. What we perceive in our consciousness is a virtual entity, a collection of information units, and so are our friends and enemies, even if they are not with us. But these representations, both the details of the nervous system and everything we know as the physical basis of our existence, as well as the known forms of self-awareness, are immaterial in the environment.
And, since the perception of the environment is representational when the external source of what we know about the individual does not exist, the representations of the individual in our consciousness do not have a mind of their own, but rather our exact then-active image of them, each relative to our own inner complexity and relative to the dynamics of the unconscious.
Now, we must also acknowledge that our individuality, not our soul, is also defined at the neural, cellular and genetic levels, that is, the combination of atoms at the molecular level that creates our individuality and the one or two percent variation at the genetic level that makes our physical design unique. But we must also acknowledge that cloning experiments are not the only way to test this point. However, human cloning experiments also deduce that individual observers/souls cannot be replicated, no matter how identical the genomes that cause the chain reaction of body assembly between mammals may be.
It goes without saying, of course, that the genome merging that can construct the individual self has not occurred throughout the universe and beyond during our existence; it is beyond these spatial coordinates. If the observer/soul were somehow connected between two cloned sheep, they would need a Cartesian transceiver that would allow them to send and receive neural impulses to each other in order to construct a collective sense of self, but their genomes do not have a blueprint for such a creation. But their genomes do not have such a blueprint for creation. Thus, what Freud called the “ego” or “I” or “soul” is not something that can be replicated or divided into several bodies to form a collective consciousness with an individual (single) self.
For information to enter consciousness, there must be a Neurological Dubai support system in which the information can be stored. This is also true for innate information systems at the neural level, because without modified and differentiated features it would not be possible to have neurons or specialized receptors in different parts of the brain, such as those responsible for and facilitating motor tasks. Similarly, in the case of memory cells and synapses, for example, to exist there must be a characteristic combination of atomic molecules, and therefore the information units contained in these memory cells and synapses must also be a unique combination of molecules for each information unit.
Otherwise, the information unit contained must be considered as a magical metaphysics in which the molecular combination is contained in the same memory cell, even if it contains different information units. But, on the other hand, the information energy in the neurocognitive system is not yet identifiable, e.g., this waveform is a “peanut”, that waveform is a “platoon”, the combination of these waveforms is a “platoon in a peanut”, etc. Furthermore, the problem of pointing out in which memory unit the information unit sought is contained is not a question of “which memory unit”. The problem of indicating which is which is limited by the lack of scanning techniques at the level of molecular connectivity of neurons.
The distribution of information from different regions and lobes of the brain combined into representations cannot be traced at the level of finding specific units of information. However, the way our retina processes individual photons is that they are converted into neural impulses that are sent first to individual neurons in the visual cortex and then to different brain areas related to perception until the whole picture is formed (V3-V5), and in a cycle of content generation, the type of classification of the relevant information (color, taste, meaning, emotion, sound, etc.). in terms of the dimensions of the information), before a parallel representation in consciousness emerges. Due to technical limitations, we can only deal logically with the problem at hand. The first logical corollary is that the brain forms representations from aggregated units of information and that the content of individual consciousness is generated by neural computation at the microscopic level.
