Chronic Kidney Disease: Classifying Normal and Abnormal Blood Pressure (CKD)

In order to properly diagnose and treat chronic kidney disease, an accurate blood pressure reading is required (CKD). The majority of BP readings utilized in the clinic are collected in the doctor’s office. But 24-hour ABPM is preferred for confirming abnormal BPs. After 5 minutes of rest in silence, a standardized office blood pressure reading using a validated, regularly calibrated device should be taken. The correct cuff size (the bladder of the cuff should wrap 80% of the arm) should be applied to the arm at the level of the atrium, and the patient should be seated with their feet flat on the ground and their back supported by a chair. You need to get at least two office readings. Avoiding caffeine and activity 30 minutes prior to a blood pressure reading is recommended. Although mistakes in measuring blood pressure (BP) are prevalent in everyday clinical practice, an accurate reading is essential for diagnosing and monitoring hypertension. Significant evidence on the impact of BP treatment on renal and CV outcomes from clinical trials in adults have all relied on BPs obtained in the clinic environment using established protocols with repeated assessments.Explore More relief hospital.

Ambulatory BP Monitoring

24-hour ABPM is the recommended BP metric in the general population and patients with CKD due to the higher correlation between BPs determined from ABPM and CV and renal outcomes. Every 15–20 minutes during the day and every 30–60 minutes during sleep, blood pressure (BP) is measured with an appropriately sized cuff worn around the patient’s biceps for 24 hours straight. Thus, ABPM’s provision of data during sleep enables measurement of average nocturnal physiologic dipping (BP should decline by >10% during sleep) and BP variability. Patients with and without CKD are at increased risk for CV disease when they have masked hypertension, characterized as regular office BPs but raised out-of-office BPs. There is mounting evidence that both nocturnal hypertension and non-dipping status increase the risk of poor CV outcomes and the development of CKD.

 

About 10% to 20% of CKD patients have white coat hypertension, and another 10% to 30% have masked hypertension, neither of which would be diagnosed without ABPM. On the other hand, ABPM is not generally accessible, and its performance is poorly reimbursed. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) can be used to verify white-coat or masked hypertension suspicions when elevated BPs acquired in the clinic using an approved approach are available. In symptomatic patients, ABPM can confirm BP control and identify hypotension episodes that occur outside the clinical environment.

Home BP Monitoring

Home blood pressure monitors and other non-clinical methods of measuring blood pressure are more convenient than ABPM for tracking blood pressure levels during treatment. Pressure should be measured with proven automated instruments, and employees should be taught to take accurate readings (as for office BP measurements). You should take two lessons at each of your two daily sittings. Although the data is less robust than 24-hour ABPM, home BP measures have also been connected with risk for bad outcomes identical to ABPM. They can be beneficial for improving BP management, especially if combined with telemedicine coaching.

BP Classification and Correlations between Bps Taken In Different Settings

The office’s blood pressure (BP) should be below 120/80 mm Hg, according to the most up-to-date recommendations from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC). An office BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg would meet the criterion for hypertension. However, the Systolic BP Intervention Trial (SPRINT) found that assignment to a systolic BP treatment goal of < 120 mm Hg lowered the risk for CV events and death, given that the BPs measured in routine clinic visits are unlikely to be obtained in the same standardized approach as in trials such as SPRINT (e.g., unobserved using an automated device), regular clinic BPs could be 5 to 10 mm Hg higher than BPs obtained in clinical trials such as SPRINT. As a result, overtreatment of BP may occur if patients are treated to achieve a systolic BP target of 120 mm Hg using only readings collected during ordinary clinical practice.

 

An office BP of 140/90 mm Hg correlates with an ABPM 24-hour average BP of 130/80 mm Hg (135/85 mm Hg daytime and 120/70 mm Hg overnight mean BPs) and a mean home BP of 135/85 mm Hg. Particularly common in CKD stages 4 and 5, resistant and refractory hypertension necessitates using numerous classes of supplementary antihypertensive medications to achieve BP control.

 

Office BPs have been the focus of the vast majority of clinical trials in both patients with and without CKD. As a result, most guidelines (including KDIGO) suggest treating hypertension in people with CKD based on office BPs. There have been no significant clinical trials of 24-hour ABPM-derived BPs in persons with CKD. We now propose routine therapy of hypertension based on office BP readings established using defined methods due to the logistical burden associated with doing ABPM regularly and the absence of reliable evidence to support ABPM-based BPs. However, we believe that ABPM- or home-based BPs should be obtained in the setting of resistant or refractory hypertension, symptoms of orthostatic or hypotension among those receiving antihypertensive therapy, and concern for autonomic dysfunction or white coat hypertension to further guide the treatment of hypertension in patients with CKD. Home BP monitoring may be effective for obtaining proper BP control among individuals with CKD.{Pro tip: https://www.mohfw.gov.in/ }