Scrum Created the Product Owner and Spawned a Myriad of Conflicting Functions
Scrum Made the Item Proprietor and Produced a Heap of Clashing Capacities

The Product Owner is one of the three accountabilities of Scrum. According to the most recent Scrum Guide, this accountability entails the following:
“The Product Owner is accountable for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the Scrum Team. How this is done may vary widely across organizations, Scrum Teams, and individuals.
The Product Owner is also accountable for effective Product Backlog management, which includes:
– Developing and explicitly communicating the Product Goal;
– Creating and clearly communicating Product Backlog items;
– Ordering Product Backlog items; and,
– Ensuring that the Product Backlog is transparent, visible and understood.” — Scrum Guide 2020

https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-06-06
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-07-07
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-08-08
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-09-09
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-10-10
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-11-11
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-12-12
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-13-13
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-14-14
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-15-15
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-16-16
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-17-17
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-18-18

There’s surprisingly little to unpack here. Only a few things make a Product Owner:

Accountability for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the Scrum Team. This last part is crucial. It implies the Product Owner is NOT responsible for maximizing the value that is not from the Scrum Team.

Effective Product Backlog Management, which includes setting a Product Goal, creating, communicating, ordering Product Backlog Items.

https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-19-19
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-20-20
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-21-21
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-22-22
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-23-23
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-24-24
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-25-25
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-26-26
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-27-27
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-28-28
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-29-29
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-30-30
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-31-31
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-32-32
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-33-33
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-34-34
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-35-35
https://digg.com/@mtvmovie-35-35

Based on this minimal description of the accountability, the many shapes and forms of the Product Owner came to life. You will find Product Owners who are merely putting the wishes of others into words. Other Product Owners have total control over the direction of the product. If you wish to find a Product Owner for your product, it is not a good idea to hire someone only based upon the fact they claimed to have filled this accountability. It doesn’t say anything.

To bring clarity, I will discuss all variations and assess if these comply with the definition of the Scrum Guide. If not, I will address why this is an issue. I will also discuss the pros and cons of the variations.

This Product Owner channels the wishes of others. She works with someone else’s product roadmap. This other person could be a Product Manager, a Project Manager, the CEO or anyone who owns the product vision and product planning. The Product Owner ensures the Scrum Team members understand what is needed for the product and in what order. This is the definition of a Proxy Product Owner or a scribe.

https://igede89wardana.medium.com/scrum-made-the-item-proprietor-and-produced-a-heap-of-clashing-capacities-65b80684bb5f
https://www.thewyco.com/news/scrum-made-the-item-proprietor-and-produced-a-heap-of-clashing-capacities-09-02-2021
https://www.thewyco.com/news/scrum-created-the-product-owner-and-spawned-a-myriad-of-conflicting-functions-09-02-2021

This type of Product Owner does not meet the Scrum criteria. You could argue she may be accountable for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the team. But if others determine the priority of items, this is not the case. On top of that, it is not the Product Owner but someone else who determines the Product Goal and order of the Product Backlog Items. You can’t make someone accountable for other people’s decisions.

This type of Product Owner is an anti-pattern. Someone else is the real Product Owner, delegating the work to a proxy. If this true Product Owner is close to the team, this is not ideal but also not a disaster. But if this person is far away, the Scrum Team is only cranking out functionality without proper ways to understand if they are on the right track and without options to adjust course.

This type of Product Owner serves one team. The team is working on a feature or component of the product. Multiple Product Owners together determine the course of their piece of the puzzle. They don’t control other aspects of the product.

As an example, Joe is a Product Owner. His team is responsible for a type of report of the payment product. His colleagues Anna and Jeena are responsible for different reports. Together, they are responsible for the reporting solutions of the payment product.

This type of Product Owner may be able to maximize the value of their piece of the puzzle and they may fully own the Product Backlog. They even align with the description of a Product Owner in the Scrum Guide. Their piece of the puzzle fits the Scrum Guide’s description of a product too:

“A product is a vehicle to deliver value. It has a clear boundary, known stakeholders, well-defined users or customers. A product could be a service, a physical product, or something more abstract.” — Scrum Guide 2020
But it is crucial to look at what a product actually is. This quote from Roman Pichler answers it for me:
“I don’t go to Amazon to search or checkout. I want to buy the right product at the right price with minimum hassle.” — Roman Pichler

https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/be01bb40084f8b93a6b54cec7767a8d82bc55f124e8846cecaf08597f0e1d2ef
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/2b0d7f12e7464d203032e6535a269a0c305d80ad37fcb0830a8934ea4589e208
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/edbd73401fde6b8b46785d26a7d98f0e98da6e01e68d999a6fd8fe81a8cebee5
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/45f6b159e0a5f7cf15278eeff3b4cf319b8f0440c00f84d0212473bea24f6e45
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/d896b586b1b61db6dbde0acfae3d796fe30489d4097c9a716d147c18e6f9ba26
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/649dfdee0b179f87ba5c49d1030bab79e8c44a69f4b5ce7f2c773f9bff203d7d
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/456d4a98766285180bf0fa272fc8e69fb5150f2fd5bcc1a500d358452dc35184
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/791fb923b689c46de67f09d0aa91d0e5bcc7711305066721c52500c6e2ce5d94
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/4779845dc46fcb59a2f6fbbb3c9a0046319eddeb8c80fd39ab684d338d54b073
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/f5fb125aa0810424d20bcf7eadadc28864d87bdbb8aeb65c7534b776c61088a4
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/49802239a3b75aa7a10dd0929a863f76ca32d7730660aa496c539890f48ce4ce
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/b6e4195a8f8724667de7b120075cb27113ca126ce739ee96c16252d45b7d50a9
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/a14a98f028423034cd731cf93b08f1d1474bf638b5ae3f81a040254d94e39404
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/17c69a7174832fe712ddc5a69ad7cba7eff99cf825c352fec4f79ee499d5e6f8
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/912c4e74a0efbfee03451ec8d4d1d5983fe3ff197f523e3e4eba3f2708cdc3df
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/7657ea100c5ae69c85299a9ef036fd1659f2a430206c22d07dbc05c36f3363c3
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/79a9baa7973c30c472a376960c8123dd701e6f05d7b9fb830a4e49e4135f7d4e
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/bf2f1f16492a3b12c21d59db31db27c1708037013c0c72ade9819bfce78b6ff2

With this in mind, this type of Product Owner is Component Owner or Feature Owner. They don’t have the view and authority to cover the complete product. Maximizing the value of their piece of the puzzle doesn’t guarantee these are the best choices for the product as a whole.

This type of Product Owner also triggers another anti-pattern: generating work for the sake of giving something for the team to do.

As a Product Owner, you work together with one or more teams. You determine the course of a software feature or component. You don’t control other aspects of the product.

This type of Product Owner has slightly more reach than the previous example as she is the only one responsible for a larger aspect of the product. But the same issues arise in the context of the complete product. This type of Product Owner is still a Component or Feature Owner only. With that, there’s a risk of silo-thinking and misalignment.

Still, this Product Owner does fit into the definition of the Scrum Guide. But it is not an ideal situation.

https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/aca99281cdb289adaf647c10df54013e4f73cc61a76963c614ac48b0b910cf67
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/6103d15eb93dcf3c2dbb8a1b09c55154c0514de3d704447116215e1f22cfdff2
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/a463e009d0f1cf9df89aebe8be54bab6fe339e60a790198474d34120ef04e61e
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/ac9922fe6d48897fb55748f51adead7bc05a72278a340a0e91c854e826ead3c7
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/31079971714aa645b734679b8977749265f276ca11b128ee18e340ec983ec6ec
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/6bc3a5917bbb092265b887b10fdf86979a3a51d1230bdf5ffc676c7bd042ad67
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/66baff2686d887cd589d5b142019faaadba102cdc4ca156ffabd870a5dbe36c2
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/dee30ad169a418b1f60b8308cb1ffc661e434402e84d9f1bd8e7bf9066ec995a
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/a547d9baaaab1233c9b947fa12379e13569d6162dc80c9fab8847bfc7ef3ac5f
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/dc8fd59ae973e08e93c387dab12a8c5911e9d5f2e2d9bc3f7575b6698009029d
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/d811e3b406efbadab4c104c466a1c226f41ea792375bbffc8347b741b3c0d776
https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/136c89437db3deed71a5a76b94e7d60bca2e11313b732f296e3062c81e754e53

As a Product Owner, you work together with one or more teams. You determine the course of the core product. You don’t control other aspects of the product.

As an example, a Product Owner can be responsible for the Amazon webshop. You have every functionality in scope, from search to checkout. However, the delivery of the goods is not part of your responsibility. You could argue that delivery is part of the product that Amazon offers to its clients.

This type of Product Owner has considerably more reach than ones I discussed until now. She has the responsibility for the complete core product. She also has a good view of the opportunities and threats for the product.

Still, this Product Owner doesn’t have the full product experience in scope. It is only the core part of the product. There’s still a chance of misalignment and silo-thinking. But the risks are lower than in the previous examples.

This type of Product Owner fits the Scrum Guide description, although she doesn’t have the overall product experience as a responsibility.